Molecular Markers of Antifungal Resistance: Potential Uses in Routine Practice and Future Perspectives

Antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) has come to establish itself as a mandatory routine in clinical practice. At the same time, the mycological diagnosis seems to have headed in the direction of non-culture-based methodologies. The downside of these developments is that the strains that cause these infections are not able to be studied for their sensitivity to antifungals. Therefore, at present, the mycological diagnosis is correctly based on laboratory evidence, but the antifungal treatment is undergoing a growing tendency to revert back to being empirical, as it was in the last century. One of the explored options to circumvent these problems is to couple non-cultured based diagnostics with molecular-based detection of intrinsically resistant organisms and the identification of molecular mechanisms of resistance (secondary resistance). The aim of this work is to review the available molecular tools for antifungal resistance detection, their limitations, and their advantages. A comprehensive description of commercially available and in-house methods is included. In addition, gaps in the development of these molecular technologies are discussed.

Automated summary

Antifungal susceptibility testing has become a mandatory aspect of clinical practice, although the direction of mycological diagnosis is shifting towards non-culture-based methods. As a result, there is a growing reliance on empirical antifungal treatment due to limitations in studying the sensitivity of infectious strains. One explored solution involves combining non-culture diagnostics with molecular detection to identify resistant organisms and resistance mechanisms.