4.7 Review

Clinically Explored Virus-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Recurrent High-Grade Glioma in Adults

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020138

关键词

glioblastoma; high-grade glioma; refractory glioma; virotherapy; oncolytic viruses; neuro-oncology; recurrent glioblastoma; chimeric viruses; clinical trials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Virotherapy, involving the use of viruses to target tumor cells, shows promise in neuro-oncology. It can be non-lytic (for gene therapy delivery) or lytic (inducing tumor cell lysis), taking advantage of the natural susceptibility of glioma cells to viral infection and stimulating an immune response against tumor cells.
As new treatment modalities are being explored in neuro-oncology, viruses are emerging as a promising class of therapeutics. Virotherapy consists of the introduction of either wild-type or engineered viruses to the site of disease, where they exert an antitumor effect. These viruses can either be non-lytic, in which case they are used to deliver gene therapy, or lytic, which induces tumor cell lysis and subsequent host immunologic response. Replication-competent viruses can then go on to further infect and lyse neighboring glioma cells. This treatment paradigm is being explored extensively in both preclinical and clinical studies for a variety of indications. Virus-based therapies are advantageous due to the natural susceptibility of glioma cells to viral infection, which improves therapeutic selectivity. Furthermore, lytic viruses expose glioma antigens to the host immune system and subsequently stimulate an immune response that specifically targets tumor cells. This review surveys the current landscape of oncolytic virotherapy clinical trials in high-grade glioma, summarizes preclinical experiences, identifies challenges associated with this modality across multiple trials, and highlights the potential to integrate this therapeutic strategy into promising combinatory approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据