4.7 Article

F sorption/desorption on two soils and on different by-products and waste materials

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 14, 页码 14676-14685

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6959-8

关键词

Adsorption; By-products; Desorption; Fluoride; Soils; Wastes

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Government of Spain) [CGL2012-36805-C02-01, CGL2012-36805-C02-02]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (FEDER in Spain)
  3. Juan de la Cierva post-doctoral contract [JCI-2012-11778]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used batch-type experiments to study F sorption/desorption on a forest soil, a vineyard soil, pyritic material, granitic material, finely and coarsely ground mussel shell, mussel shell calcination ash, oak wood ash, pine-sawdust, slate processing fines, and three different mixtures that included three components: sewage sludge, mussel shell ash, and calcined mussel shell or pine wood ash. The three waste mixtures, forest soil, pyritic material, and shell ash showed high sorption capacity (73-91 % of added F) and low desorption, even when 100 mg F L-1 was added. All these materials (and to a lower extent wood ash) could be useful to remove F from polluted media (as certain soils, dumping sites, and contaminated waters). The vineyard soil, the granitic material, mussel shell, slate fines, and pine-sawdust were less effective in F removal. In most cases, sorption data fitted better to the Freundlich than to the Langmuir equation. These results can be useful to program the correct management of the soils, by-products, and waste materials assayed, mostly in situations where F concentrations are excessive and F removal should be promoted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据