4.7 Article

Thickness-dependent properties of ultrathin bismuth and antimony chalcogenide films formed by physical vapor deposition and their application in thermoelectric generators

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100587

关键词

Ultrathin film; Narrow band gap layered semiconductor; Bismuth chalcogenide; Antimony telluride; Thickness-dependent thermoelectric properties

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [1.1.1.1/16/A/257]
  2. ERDF project [1.1.1.2/1/16/037]
  3. European Union [H2020-WIDESPREAD-012016-2017, 739508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a simple and cost-effective physical vapor deposition method for producing high-quality Bi2Se3 and Sb2Te3 ultrathin films on various substrates. The synthesized ultrathin films exhibit interesting thermoelectric properties at specific thicknesses, comparable to those grown by molecular beam epitaxy method. Performance of the best ultrathin films is tested in a prototype of a thermoelectric generator.
In this work, a simple cost-effective physical vapor deposition method for obtaining high-quality Bi2Se3 and Sb2Te3 ultrathin films with thicknesses down to 5 nm on mica, fused quartz, and monolayer graphene substrates is reported. Physical vapor deposition of continuous Sb2Te3 ultrathin films with thicknesses 10 nm and below is demonstrated for the first time. Studies of thermoelectrical properties of synthesized Bi2Se3 ultrathin films deposited on mica indicated opening of a hybridization gap in Bi2Se3 ultrathin films with thicknesses below 6 nm. Both Bi2Se3 and Sb2Te3 ultrathin films showed the Seebeck coefficient and thermoelectrical power factors comparable with the parameters obtained for the high-quality thin films grown by the molecular beam epitaxy method. Performance of the best Bi2Se3 and Sb2Te3 ultrathin films is tested in the two-leg prototype of a thermoelectric generator. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据