4.7 Article

Zinc dendrite growth and inhibition strategies

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY ENERGY
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100692

关键词

Zinc-based batteries; Dendritic morphology; Formation mechanism; Suppression modes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706013]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy [KF2024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc is an ideal energy carrier with high energy density, low cost, and environmental friendliness, but the issue of zinc dendrite growth remains unresolved. Understanding the formation mechanism of zinc dendrites is necessary to guide inhibition strategies.
Zinc is an ideal energy carrier due to its high energy density, low cost, and environmental friendliness. However, dendrite growth during plating/stripping hinders the practical application of zinc-based secondary batteries. Although inhibition strategies have been proposed in recent years to eliminate the negative effects of zinc dendrites, the problem of dendrite growth is still unresolved. Therefore, understanding the formation mechanism of zinc dendrites is necessary to guide the inhibition strategies of zinc dendrite growth. The mechanism of zinc dendrite growth is investigated, and the related inhibition strategies are summarized in this review. First, the physicochemical properties of zinc and the advantages and disadvantages of zinc electrodes are described in detail. Second, the nucleation and dendrite growth of zinc are analyzed based on the existing theoretical models of zinc dendrite growth, pointing out the key factors affecting the nucleation and growth behavior of zinc dendrites. Thirdly, the measures to optimize the electric field distribution on the electrode surface are summarized, enhancing the migration of zinc ions and dendrite-free zinc deposition. Last, the challenges and the expectations for zinc-based batteries in the future development are presented. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据