4.7 Article

Oxalic acid functionalization of BaTiO3 nanobelts for promoting their piezo-degradation organic contaminants

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIOMICS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1275-1283

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.03.002

关键词

BaTiO3 nanobelts; Surface functionalization; Piezo-catalysis; Piezo-sensitization

资金

  1. National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of China [201910356015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, chemical functionalization was performed on nano-scaled BaTiO3 piezoelectric materials, and oxalic acid functionalized BaTiO3 nanobelts exhibited high piezo-catalytic rate and degradation efficiency under ultrasonic vibrations. This work provides insights for the development of novel catalysts for special applications.
Surface functionalization of piezoelectric greatly determines its piezo-catalytic activity and selectivity in that functional group affect specific reactants' surface adsorption and activation abilities. Herein, we propose chemical functionalization on the surface of nano-scaled BaTiO3 piezoelectric via a one-pot hydrothermal process using polyethylene glycol as surfactant, and evaluate its piezo-catalytic activity and selectivity by degrading model antibiotic and dye reactants under ultrasonic vibrations. Acetate or/and oxalic unidentate ligands on the surface of BaTiO3 nanobelts can be formed by controlling precursor and hydrothermal parameters. Particularly, oxalic acid functionalized BaTiO3 nanobelts presented a high piezo-catalytic rate constant of 0.068 min(-1) for Rhodamine B solution and maintained >87% degradation efficiency within 30 min under the condition of ultrasonic bath with 40 kHz and 100 W, which was mainly ascribed to piezo-sensitization effect. This work provides references for the preparation of chemical functionalized catalysts and also contributes to the development of novel catalysts for special applications. (C) 2021 The Chinese Ceramic Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据