4.6 Article

Digital image correlation for the analysis of in-plane tested unreinforced masonry walls

期刊

STRUCTURES
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 427-445

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.051

关键词

Unreinforced masonry; In-plane cyclic loading; Pier-spandrel; Digital image correlation; Deformation measurement

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP160102070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized both DIC and traditional LVDT techniques to accurately measure deformations in unreinforced masonry walls with openings under in-plane loading and pre-compression. The findings provided insights into the integrity of pier and spandrel structures through cracking analyses during cyclic loading.
In the experimental assessment of the in-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls containing openings, accurate measurement of the deformations occurring in the pier and spandrel substructures is important. Eight full-scale perforated URM walls were tested under in-plane cyclic loading and constant vertical pre-compression load. To measure the deformation of the walls (pier-spandrel substructures) during testing and to capture the full-field cracking of the masonry, a two dimensional (2D) Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technique was used in parallel with traditional hard-wired instrumentation (Linear Variable Differential Transformers, commonly referred to as LVDTs for short). This paper describes the detailed procedures of using DIC in large scale masonry wall testing. Firstly, the digital images at the first peak of each displacement amplitude in both push and pull directions for one specimen were analysed using the VIC-2D software to validate the DIC results against the LVDT recorded measurements. After confirming the accuracy of the DIC measurements for the specimen, the pier-spandrel movements and the cracking analyses of all the walls were performed in order to better understand the integrity of these elements during cyclic in-plane loading.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据