4.6 Article

Effects of WC on the cavitation erosion resistance of FeCoCrNiB0.2 high entropy alloy coating prepared by laser cladding

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102154

关键词

Metals and alloys; Laser processing; Scanning electron microscopy; SEM; Corrosion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The FeCoCrNiB0.2 + 20 wt.% WC coating showed higher Vickers hardness and lower cumulative mass loss compared to the FeCoCrNiB0.2 coating. The presence of chloride ions accelerated the removal of material from the surface, leading to combined cavitation-corrosion damage. Adding 20 wt.% WC reduced the number and depth of cavitation pits, indicating that WC could mitigate cavitation damage.
To improving the cavitation erosion resistance (R-e) of the FeCoCrNiB0.2 high entropy alloy (HEA), the FeCoCrNiB0.2 + WC (0 wt.%, 20 wt.%) HEA coatings were synthesized with premixed high-purity on Q235 steel by laser cladding (LC). The effects of WC on the hardness and R-e were investigated. The cavitation erosion (CE) behavior in distilled water and 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution and microhardness were evaluated using an ultrasonic vibrator and Microscopy/Vickers hardness tester. The cavitation mass loss and surface morphology were used to characterize the cavitation damage. Experimental results showed that the Vickers hardness of FeCoCrNiB0.2 + 20 wt.% WC coating was higher than that of FeCoCrNiB0.2 coating, and the cumulative mass loss of FeCoCrNiB0.2 + 20 w.t% WC coating was less than that of FeCoCrNiB0.2 coating. The presence of chloride ion interacts with CE, forming a combined cavitation-corrosion damage, which accelerates the removal of material from the surface. Adding 20 wt.% WC, the number of cavitation pits was significantly reduced and the depth of pits also became shallower, which means that the addition of WC could weaken the degree of cavitation damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据