4.6 Article

Low-Coherence Shearing Interferometry With Constant Off-Axis Angle

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2020.611679

关键词

quantitative phase imaging; low-coherence interferometry; shearing interferometry; microscopic imaging; digital holography

资金

  1. H2020 European Research Council (ERC) [678316]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a wide-field interferometric imaging module that utilizes shearing interferometry with constant off-axis angle and a low-coherence light source to provide quantitative phase profiles with lower spatial coherent noise. The module allows full control of the shearing distance between interfering beams and can be used as an add-on unit to a conventional bright-field microscope for biomedical and metrological measurements.
We present a wide-field interferometric imaging module for biomedical and metrological measurements, employing shearing interferometry with constant off-axis angle (SICA) that can work, for the first time, with a low-coherence light source. In the SICA module, the shearing distance between the interfering beams can be fully controlled without a direct relation with the off-axis angle. In contrast to our previous SICA module, here we use a low-coherence illumination source, providing quantitative phase profiles with significantly lower spatial coherent noise. Although a low-coherence source is used, we obtain off-axis interference on the entire camera sensor, where the optical path difference between the two beams is compensated by using a glass window positioned in the confocal plane. This highly stable, common-path, low-coherence, single-shot interferometric module can be used as an add-on unit to a conventional bright-field microscope illuminated by a low-coherence source. We demonstrate the advantages of using the module by quantitative phase imaging of a polymer bead, fluctuations in a human white blood cell, and dynamics of human sperm cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据