4.6 Article

Control of deformation and annealing process to produce incoherent Σ3 boundaries in Hastelloy C-276 alloy

期刊

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2021.100944

关键词

Hastelloy C-276; Annealing treatment; Incoherent Sigma 3 grain boundary; Grain boundary character distribution; EBSD

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50834008, 11972348, U1738108]
  2. PhD Research Foundation Project of North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering [BKY201702]
  3. Colleges and Universities in Hebei Province Science and Technology Research Project [ZD2018239]
  4. Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Thermal Protection Materials, China [SZX2020038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reasonable deformation and annealing treatment parameters lead to more incoherent Sigma 3 boundaries playing an important role in the optimization of GBE.
Hastelloy C-276 samples were cold-rolled with their thickness reduction of 7.5% and 15%, and then annealed at 1100 degrees C for 5-60 min in solid solution. The grain boundary character distributions (GBCDs) were characterized by a technique of electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD). Results indicated that, more convoluted Sigma 3 boundaries (i.e. incoherent 13 boundaries) are generated by reasonable annealing time in low strain (7.5%) sample during strain-induced boundary migration (SIBM) processing. They can induce higher Sigma 3(n) fraction and activate more interactions between special boundaries for GBE. Instead, more coherent Sigma 3 boundaries were produced by moderate strain (15%) and annealing treatment with the occurrence of static recrystallization (SRX). The recrystallized fine grains possess fewer incoherent Sigma 3 boundaries cannot promote to get more multiple twinning for optimization of GBCD. Therefore, reasonable deformation and annealing treatment parameters lead to more incoherent Sigma 3 boundaries would play an important role in the optimization of GBE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据