4.7 Article

An overview of a twofold effect of crystalline admixtures in cement-based materials: from permeability-reducers to self-healing stimulators

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102400

关键词

Crystalline admixture; Self-healing; Permeability-reducing admixture; Mechanical recovery; Durability

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [1414016]
  2. CNPq-Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  3. FAPERJ-Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  4. FINEP-Empresa Brasileira de Inovacao e Pesquisa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an overview of relevant studies on the enhancement promoted by crystalline admixtures (CAs) in cement-based materials, acting both as permeability reducers and self-healing stimulators. The main mechanisms of CAs, their impact in cementitious systems, and synergetic effects with other constituents are discussed. Conclusions highlight research needs and future works in this area.
This work presents an overview of the most relevant studies developed to understand the enhancement promoted by the double effect of the crystalline admixtures (CAs), both as permeability-reducers and as self-healing stimulators in cement-based materials. Thus, an in-depth investigation was carried out of the main mechanisms of CAs disclosed in the literature in order to associate the relationship between healing products and performance improvement in cementitious materials. Further, an examination of the impact of different factors in cementitious systems with CAs was reported, as well as the synergetic effects of CAs with other constituents. Finally, conclusions were drawn highlighting research needs and addressing future works in order to provide a substantial overview of the latest information in the literature for those who are working or intend to work with this type of admixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据