4.7 Article

A novel approach for classification of soils based on laboratory tests using Adaboost, Tree and ANN modeling

期刊

TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100508

关键词

Soil classification; Adaboost; Tree model; Soil type

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Training [B2020-GHA-03]
  2. University of Transport and Communications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research presents new models for classifying soil types based on Adaboost classifiers, which can increase accuracy and reduce project costs.
This research focuses on presenting new models based on classifiers that can be applied to various problems. Adaboost is a type of ensemble learning machine that uses classifiers that contain a range of base models. This study used enhanced Adaboost models to classify soil types base on tree algorithm models that are less commonly used in this area. Determining the type of soil in different geotechnical projects is very important. Using soil classification, soil properties such as mechanical properties, performance against static and dynamic loads can be found. Regarding the importance of the subject, 440 samples of the actual project were used to design this new methodology. The dataset included clay content, moisture content, specific gravity, void ratio, plastic, and liquid limit parameters to determine the type of soil classification. These samples were tested with high precision and the actual type of classification was obtained. For comparison, two enhanced tree and neural network model were designed and developed according to these conditions. The results of this classification were presented for different soil samples. The developed adaboost model showed that it could well classify the soil. This model showed that only 11 samples were not correctly identified among the total data (88 data). Therefore, this new technique can be used to increase the accuracy and reduce the cost of projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据