相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Three-port versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study
Ashraf Abd El-Azeem Mohamed et al.
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2020)
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
A. Arezzo et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis
Federico Coccolini et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2015)
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 4-Port, 3-Port, and Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Zhamak Khorgami et al.
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY (2014)
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients
Stavros A. Antoniou et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2014)
Three-Port Versus Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Shaoliang Sun et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2009)
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)