4.6 Article

Correlation of an Index-Lesion-Based SPECT Dosimetry Method with Mean Tumor Dose and Clinical Outcome after 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030428

关键词

radioligand therapy; Lu-177-PSMA; dosimetry; SPECT; mCRPC

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Research Training Group GRK 2274 [299102935]
  3. Ludwig-Maximilians-University (FoFoLe program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that single index-lesion-based SPECT dosimetry correlates well with the response to PSMA-RLT, suggesting it may be a fast and feasible dosimetry approach for clinical routine.
Background: Dosimetry can tailor prostate-specific membrane-antigen-targeted radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, whole-body tumor dosimetry is challenging in patients with a high tumor burden. We evaluate a simplified index-lesion-based single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dosimetry method in correlation with clinical outcome. Methods: 30 mCRPC patients were included (median 71 years). The dosimetry was performed for the first cycle using quantitative Lu-177-SPECT. The response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST criteria, as well as changes in PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) in post-therapy PSMA-PET and biochemical response according to PSA changes after two RLT cycles. Results: Mean tumor doses as well as index-lesion doses were significantly higher in PERCIST responders compared to non-responders (10.2 +/- 12.0 Gy/GBq vs. 4.0 +/- 2.9 Gy/GBq, p = 0.03 and 13.7 +/- 14.2 Gy/GBq vs. 5.9 +/- 4.4 Gy/GBq, p = 0.04, respectively). No significant differences in mean tumor and index lesion doses were observed between responders and non-responders according to RECIST 1.1, PSMA-TV, and biochemical response criteria. Conclusion: Compared to mean tumor doses on a patient level, single index-lesion-based SPECT dosimetry correlates equally well with the response to PSMA-RLT according to PERCIST criteria and may represent a fast and feasible dosimetry approach for clinical routine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据