4.6 Article

Visible-Ultraviolet Upconversion Carbon Quantum Dots for Enhancement of the Photocatalytic Activity of Titanium Dioxide

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 4247-4254

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05182

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1100900, 2016YFC1100903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visible-ultraviolet upconversion carbon quantum dots were synthesized and used to prepare CQDs/TiO2 composites, with CT-1 composite showing the best degradation efficiency for methyl orange. The composite exhibited excellent degradation performance under visible light, attributed to the presence of free radicals.
Visible-ultraviolet upconversion carbon quantum dots (CQDs) are synthesized with a hydrothermal method using L-glutamic acid (L-Glu) and m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and then combined with commercial nano-TiO2 to prepare CQDs/TiO2 composites. The fluorescence spectra prove that the prepared CQDs can convert approximately 600 nm visible light into 350 nm ultraviolet light. In photocatalysis experiments, CT-1, a CQDs/TiO2 composite with 1:1 molar ratio of L-Glu to TiO2, has the best degradation efficiency for methyl orange (MO). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments confirm that CT-1 is composed of quasi-spherical nano-TiO2 and CQDs with a crystal plane of graphitic carbon. CT-1 can degrade 70.56% of MO (40 ppm) within 6 h under the irradiation of a 600 nm light source, which is close to its degradation rate of 78.75% under 365 nm ultraviolet light. The apparent rate constant of CT-1 degradation equation is 12.7 times that of TiO2. Free radical scavenging experiments and electron spin resonance (ESR) tests show that the degradation ability should be attributed to the existence of h(+) and (OH)-O-center dot under visible light. Therefore, we provide a simple and low-cost solution with heavy-metal-free products to improve the photocatalytic performance of TiO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据