4.6 Article

A New Model of Alcoholic Fermentation under a Byproduct Inhibitory Effect

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 4137-4146

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education [FRGS/2/2013/TK05/UPM/01/3]
  2. Universiti Putra Malaysia [GP-IPS/2016/9502500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a new mathematical model to describe the inhibitory effect of byproducts on alcoholic fermentation. The results showed a linear increase in byproduct concentration with glucose concentration and a significant inhibitory effect on yeast growth. The new model performed better and more accurately than the classical Monod model.
Despite the advantages of continuous fermentation whereby ethanol is selectively removed from the fermenting broth to reduce the end-product inhibition, this process can concentrate minor secondary products to the point where they become toxic to the yeast. This study aims to develop a new mathematical model do describe the inhibitory effect of byproducts on alcoholic fermentation including glycerol, lactic acid, acetic acid, and succinic acid, which were reported as major byproducts during batch alcoholic fermentation. The accumulation of these byproducts during the different stages of batch fermentation has been quantified. The yields of total byproducts, glycerol, acetic acid, and succinic acid per gram of glucose were 0.0442, 0.023, 0.0155, and 0.0054, respectively. It was found that the concentration of these byproducts linearly increases with the increase in glucose concentration in the range of 25-250 g/L. The results have also showed that byproduct concentration has a significant inhibitory effect on specific growth coefficient (mu) whereas no effect was observed on the half-velocity constant (K-s). A new mathematical model of alcoholic fermentation was developed considering the byproduct inhibitory effect, which showed a good performance and more accuracy compared to the classical Monod model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据