4.7 Article

A Novel Isolate of Bacillus cereus Promotes Growth in Tomato and Inhibits Clavibacter michiganensis Infection under Greenhouse Conditions

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10030506

关键词

PGPB; bacterial canker; crop protection

资金

  1. SEP-CONACYT 2016 [283259]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia
  3. Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro
  4. Fondo para el desarrollo del conocimiento (FONDEC-UAQ-2019)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterial isolate Bacillus cereus strain Amazcala (B.c-A) from castor bean roots displayed the ability to promote tomato plant growth and significantly reduce the severity of bacterial canker disease caused by Clavibacter michiganensis (Cmm) under greenhouse conditions, indicating its potential as a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and disease control tool.
The need to produce food in a sustainable way to counteract the effects of excessive use of agrochemicals opens the door to the generation of new technologies that are not based on fossil fuels and are less toxic to ecosystems. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) could represent an alternative to chemical biofertilizers and pesticides offering protection for biotic and abiotic stresses. In this work, a bacterial isolate from roots of castor bean (Ricinus communis) was identified and named as Bacillus cereus strain Amazcala (B.c-A). This isolate displayed the ability to solubilize inorganic phosphate and produce gibberellic acid (GA3). Moreover, this bacterium provided significant increases in height, stem width, dry weight, and total chlorophyll content in tomato plants. Interestingly, B.c-A also significantly decreased the severity of bacterial canker disease on tomato caused by Clavibacter michiganensis (Cmm) in preventive disease assays under greenhouse conditions. Based on our results, B.c-A can be considered as PGPB and a useful tool in Cmm disease control on tomato plant under greenhouse conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据