4.7 Article

Central composite modeling for electrochemical degradation of paint manufacturing plant wastewater: One-step/two-response optimization

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101264

关键词

Response surface methodology; Paint manufacturing plant; Wastewater; Electrooxidation

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP)
  2. Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Turkey [FBA-2019-8533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of paint manufacturing wastewaters is a complex process, and electrochemical degradation can effectively remove color and COD, reducing energy consumption and operating costs.
Paint manufacturing wastewaters contain highly toxic and organic biorefractory substances and have adverse effects on human health. In this study, the removal of color and chemical oxygen demand (COD) from a paint manufacturing plant (PMW) wastewater by electrochemical degradation using Ti/Pt anodes were investigated with a five-factor central composite model. pH (4-11), temperature (10-40 degrees C), NaCl concentration (10-100 mM), current (5-15 A) and feed rate (10-40 mL/min.) were selected as independent operating parameters. The results obtained were analyzed with analysis of variance and a quadratic model was developed to examine the effects of parameters affecting degradation conditions. Optimum conditions for maximizing color and COD removal while minimizing energy consumption were determined by numerical optimization and found to be pH of 4, temperature of 39.99 degrees C, NaCl concentration of 100 mM, feed rate of 40 mL/min and current of 5.21 A. Under optimum conditions, the estimated color removal was 79.68% and the COD removal was 80.54%. The compatibility of the predicted optimum conditions was confirmed by experimental data. In experiments performed under optimum conditions, the energy consumed by the system was calculated as 8.51 kWh/m(3) and the operating cost to treat 1 m(3) PMW was determined as $1.02. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据