4.6 Article

Molecular Analysis of Polymyxin Resistance among Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Colombia

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10030284

关键词

Klebsiella pneumoniae; multidrug resistance; polymyxins; whole-genome sequencing

资金

  1. Universidad El Bosque [PCI 2018-10106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study in Colombia identified clonal dissemination of polymyxin and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates, mainly associated with CG258 and bla(KPC-3), highlighting limited therapeutic options for carbapenem-resistant strains.
Polymyxin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae has been attributed to mutations in mgrB, phoPQ, pmrAB, and crrAB and to the presence of mcr plasmid-mediated genes. Herein, we describe the molecular characteristics of 24 polymyxin- and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates recovered from six Colombian cities between 2009 and 2019. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to polymyxin were confirmed by broth microdilution, and whole-genome sequencing was performed to determine sequence type, resistome, and mutations in the genes related to polymyxin resistance, as well the presence of mcr. The results showed high-level resistance to polymyxin (MICs >= 4 mu g/mL). bla(KPC-3) was present in the majority of isolates (17/24; 71%), followed by bla(KPC-2) (6/24; 25%) and bla(NDM-1) (1/24; 4%). Most isolates belonged to the CG258 (17/24; 71%) and presented amino acid substitutions in PmrB (22/24; 92%) and CrrB (15/24; 63%); mutations in mgrB occurred in only five isolates (21%). Additional mutations in pmrA, crrA, and phoPQ nor any of the mcr resistance genes were identified. In conclusion, we found clonal dissemination of polymyxin and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates in Colombia, mainly associated with CG258 and bla(KPC-3). Surveillance of this multidrug-resistant clone is warranted due to the limited therapeutic options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据