Countering Avoidance Strategies Used by Fishers to Avoid Detection During Illegal Fishing

Non-compliers typically avoid detection by authorities, benefiting from increased catch and income. While detection-avoidance strategies (e.g., secret compartments to hide illegal catch) are commonly used in the nature conservation context, they remain largely unstudied. We address this knowledge gap in three sections. First, we introduce and hypothesize the likelihood of non-compliers adopting detectionavoidance strategies in the broader conservation context. Second, we identify and categorize detection-avoidance strategies used by small-scale fishers. Third, we provide recommendations for countering detection-avoidance strategies (i.e., countermeasures). Because countermeasures are context-specific, they should be informed through systematic processes such as the intelligence cycle. If used properly, enforcement activities and countermeasures can help build voluntary compliance, particularly through procedural justice, or acting in a way that users perceive as fair and just.

Automated summary

Non-compliers often benefit from detection-avoidance strategies to evade authorities. Researching and countering these strategies are crucial for nature conservation efforts. Developing countermeasures and promoting voluntary compliance can enhance environmental justice and efficacy.