4.7 Review

Toxicity and oxidative stress induced by chromium in workers exposed from different occupational settings around the globe: A review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 20, 页码 20151-20167

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7463-x

关键词

Workers; Chromium; Occupational setting; Oxidative stress; Cr toxicity

资金

  1. Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. Key Application and Development Program of Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2014yykfC20004]
  3. HEC Start Up Research grant, Pakistan [21-700/SRGP/RD/HEC/2016]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present review focused on the levels and toxicological status of heavy metals especially chromium (Cr) in the exposed workers from different occupational settings around the globe and in Pakistan. It was found that exposed workers from leather tanning and metal plating units showed elevated levels of Cr than the workers from other occupational settings. Cr and other heavy metals level in biological matrices of the exposed workers in different occupational settings revealed that developing countries are severely contaminated. Occupational settings from the Sialkot district, Pakistan exhibited elevated level of Cr in biological entities of the exposed workers. Review suggested that higher level of Cr exposure to the workers enhance the oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hydroxyl (OH) radical generation) which may cause; cellular and molecular damage such as genotoxicity and chromosomal aberration formations, and carcinogenic effects. This review will help to understand the Cr contamination mechanisms and associated health implications in different occupational settings around the globe in general and particularly to Pakistan. This study will also assist occupational health and safety management authorities to devise or change the Cr recommended exposure limits (REL) for different occupational settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据