4.5 Review

Clinical Implications of Polymicrobial Synergism Effects on Antimicrobial Susceptibility

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10020144

关键词

polymicrobial; antimicrobial susceptibility; synergism; interactions; clinical; diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that many human infectious processes are associated with a polymicrobial burden, which can lead to treatment failure and worse patient prognoses. Current clinical standards for determining antimicrobial susceptibility only test unimicrobial suspensions, but there is growing evidence that microorganisms in a polymicrobial environment can synergize their activities and impact antimicrobial susceptibility through resistance and tolerance mechanisms.
With the development of next generation sequencing technologies in recent years, it has been demonstrated that many human infectious processes, including chronic wounds, cystic fibrosis, and otitis media, are associated with a polymicrobial burden. Research has also demonstrated that polymicrobial infections tend to be associated with treatment failure and worse patient prognoses. Despite the importance of the polymicrobial nature of many infection states, the current clinical standard for determining antimicrobial susceptibility in the clinical laboratory is exclusively performed on unimicrobial suspensions. There is a growing body of research demonstrating that microorganisms in a polymicrobial environment can synergize their activities associated with a variety of outcomes, including changes to their antimicrobial susceptibility through both resistance and tolerance mechanisms. This review highlights the current body of work describing polymicrobial synergism, both inter- and intra-kingdom, impacting antimicrobial susceptibility. Given the importance of polymicrobial synergism in the clinical environment, a new system of determining antimicrobial susceptibility from polymicrobial infections may significantly impact patient treatment and outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据