4.7 Article

Preparation and electrochemical performance of multilayered Ni(OH)2 nanoflakes with different orientations uniformly anchored on reduced graphene oxide sheets

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102295

关键词

Ni(OH())2; RGO; Nanoflakes; Orientation; Electrochemical performance; Supercapacitors

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Sichuan Province, China [2017GZ0396]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different orientations of multilayered Ni(OH)(2) nanoflakes anchored on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets were prepared by a facile chemical deposition method. The vertically oriented Ni(OH)(2)/rGO composite exhibited higher specific capacitance compared to the horizontally oriented counterpart, with exceptional rate capability and cycling stability. Overall, this orientation-controlled Ni(OH)(2)/rGO composite shows promise as an electrode material for energy storage systems.
Different orientations of multilayered Ni(OH)(2) nanoflakes uniformly anchored on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets are prepared by a facile chemical deposition method. It is found that vertically oriented Ni(OH)(2)/rGO has a greater specific capacitance than the horizontally oriented counterpart. The electrochemical performance of as-fabricated vertically oriented Ni(OH)(2)/rGO composite as cathode material for supercapacitors shows an unexceptionable specific capacitance along with high rate capability and cycling stability. As a result, the specific capacitance reaches 1770 F/g at a current density of 1 A/g in 6 M KOH solution. Furthermore, the Ni(OH)(2)/rGO electrode displays an ultrahigh rate capability (maintaining 864 F/g at a high current density of 50 A/g) and a super cycling stability (142.2% capacity retention after 3000 charge-discharge cycles). Such an orientation-controlled Ni(OH)(2)/rGO composite is thus a promising electrode material for great applications in energy storage systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据