4.7 Article

Prediction of fire risk based on cloud computing

期刊

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 1537-1544

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.008

关键词

Cloud computing; Fire risk prediction; Association rule mining; Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN)

资金

  1. Sub-project of National 13th Five-Year Key Research and Development Plan [2018YFC0807000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel method for fire risk prediction based on cloud computing and big data analysis, which evaluates risk by mining historical data and association rules, with good experimental results, and can provide reference for risk prediction of other disasters.
The development of cloud computing and big data analysis has given rise to various disaster prediction methods. To reduce the probability of fire accidents, it is critical to predict the fire risk by mining the massive historical data on fire. Considering the advantages of MapReduce, a cloud computing method, in parallel processing of data, this paper puts forward a novel prediction method for fire risk that mines the association rules in the time domain. Firstly, the risk of disaster-causing factors and the ability of disaster-reducing factors were evaluated. Based on the evaluation results, an evaluation index system was constructed for fire risk, and the indices were quantified through proper weighting. Facing the historical fire data, the authors designed the spatiotemporal density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (spatiotemporal DBSCAN), and quantitatively evaluated fire risk by the association rule mining algorithm based on time domain partition (TDP). The effectiveness of our method in fire risk prediction was verified through experiments. The research results provide reference for the risk prediction of other disasters. (C) 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据