4.6 Article

Wild Boars Carry Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Escherichia coli

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020367

关键词

wild boars; ESBL-producing Escherichia coli; AmpC; multidrug resistance; MRSA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study revealed the presence of ESBL-/AmpC-E. coli in wild boars, with a significant positive association with human population density. The E. coli isolates carried various β-lactamase genes and showed multiple drug resistances.
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represent major healthcare concerns. The role of wildlife in the epidemiology of these bacteria is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine their prevalence in wild boars in Germany and to characterize individual isolates. A total of 375 fecal samples and 439 nasal swabs were screened for the presence of ESBL-/AmpC-E. coli and MRSA, respectively. The associations of seven demographic and anthropogenic variables with the occurrence of ESBL-/AmpC-E. coli were statistically evaluated. Collected isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, molecular typing methods, and gene detection by PCR and genome sequencing. ESBL-/AmpC-E. coli were detected in 22 fecal samples (5.9%) whereas no MRSA were detected. The occurrence of ESBL-/AmpC-E. coli in wild boars was significantly and positively associated with human population density. Of the 22 E. coli, 19 were confirmed as ESBL-producers and carried genes belonging to bla(CTX-M) group 1 or bla(SHV-12). The remaining three isolates carried the AmpC-beta-lactamase gene bla(CMY-2). Several isolates showed additional antimicrobial resistances. All four major phylogenetic groups were represented with group B1 being the most common. This study demonstrates that wild boars can serve as a reservoir for ESBL-/AmpC-producing and multidrug-resistant E. coli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据