4.7 Review

Common and Novel Markers for Measuring Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Ex Vivo in Research and Clinical Practice-Which to Use Regarding Disease Outcomes?

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10030414

关键词

transcription factors; immune system; diet; chronic diseases; reactive oxygen species; superoxide; dietary inflammatory index; acute phase proteins; cell counting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many chronic diseases are associated with low-grade inflammation, which is closely related to oxidative stress that can either cause or be caused by inflammation. Valid biomarkers can help detect and track the progression of oxidative stress/inflammation and evaluate treatment efficacy, and should be stable, non-invasive, affordable and easy to determine. Commonly used markers include acute-phase proteins, cytokines, and oxidative stress products, but novel markers also show promise.
Many chronic conditions such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type-2 diabetes, obesity, peripheral/coronary artery disease and auto-immune diseases are associated with low-grade inflammation. Closely related to inflammation is oxidative stress (OS), which can be either causal or secondary to inflammation. While a low level of OS is physiological, chronically increased OS is deleterious. Therefore, valid biomarkers of these signalling pathways may enable detection and following progression of OS/inflammation as well as to evaluate treatment efficacy. Such biomarkers should be stable and obtainable through non-invasive methods and their determination should be affordable and easy. The most frequently used inflammatory markers include acute-phase proteins, essentially CRP, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen and procalcitonin, and cytokines, predominantly TNF alpha, interleukins 1 beta, 6, 8, 10 and 12 and their receptors and IFN gamma. Some cytokines appear to be disease-specific. Conversely, OS-being ubiquitous-and its biomarkers appear less disease or tissue-specific. These include lipid peroxidation products, e.g., F2-isoprostanes and malondialdehyde, DNA breakdown products (e.g., 8-OH-dG), protein adducts (e.g., carbonylated proteins), or antioxidant status. More novel markers include also -omics related ones, as well as non-invasive, questionnaire-based measures, such as the dietary inflammatory-index (DII), but their link to biological responses may be variable. Nevertheless, many of these markers have been clearly related to a number of diseases. However, their use in clinical practice is often limited, due to lacking analytical or clinical validation, or technical challenges. In this review, we strive to highlight frequently employed and useful markers of inflammation-related OS, including novel promising markers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据