4.6 Review

Endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization: age, gender and blood pressure, do they matter?

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA
卷 219, 期 1, 页码 108-123

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apha.12628

关键词

ageing; endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization; gender; hypertension; intermediate-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels; small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels

资金

  1. General Research Fund of Hong Kong SAR Research Grant Council [HKU769907M, HKU769808]
  2. Stiftelsen Nordisk Fysiologi, SNF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under physiological conditions, the endothelium generates vasodilator signals [prostacyclin, nitric oxide NO and endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization (EDH)], for the regulation of vascular tone. The relative importance of these two signals depends on the diameter of the blood vessels: as the diameter of the arteries decreases, the contribution of EDH to the regulation of vascular tone increases. The mechanism involved in EDH varies with species and blood vessel types; nevertheless, activation of endothelial intermediate-and small-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels (IKCa and SKCa, respectively) is characteristic of the EDH pathway. IKCa-and SKCa-mediated EDH are reduced with endothelial dysfunction, which develops with ageing and hypertension, and is less pronounced in female than in age-matched male until after menopause. Impaired EDH-mediated relaxation is related to a reduced involvement of SKCa, so that the response becomes more dependent on IKCa. The latter depends on the activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and silent information regulator T1 (SIRT1), proteins associated with the process of cellular senescence and vascular signalling in response to the female hormone. An understanding of the role of AMPK and/or SIRT1 in EDH-like responses may help identifying effective pharmacological strategies to prevent the development of vascular complications of different aetiologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据