4.7 Review

State-of-the-Art Vaccine Research for Aquaculture Use: The Case of Three Economically Relevant Fish Species

期刊

VACCINES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020140

关键词

adjuvants; aquaculture; experimental challenge; fish immunology; fish welfare; infectious diseases; vaccines

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, DIBAF-Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past three decades, the aquaculture sector has grown significantly, but infectious diseases remain the major causes of mortality and economic losses in aquaculture. While some bacterial diseases can be treated with commercial drugs, many diseases still lack effective vaccines.
In the last three decades, the aquaculture sector has experienced a 527% growth, producing 82 million tons for a first sale value estimated at 250 billion USD. Infectious diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, or parasites are the major causes of mortality and economic losses in commercial aquaculture. Some pathologies, especially those of bacterial origin, can be treated with commercially available drugs, while others are poorly managed. In fact, despite having been recognized as a useful preventive measure, no effective vaccination against many economically relevant diseases exist yet, such as for viral and parasitic infections. The objective of the present review is to provide the reader with an updated perspective on the most significant and innovative vaccine research on three key aquaculture commodities. European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax), Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) were chosen because of their economic relevance, geographical distinctiveness, and representativeness of different culture systems. Scientific papers about vaccines against bacterial, viral, and parasitic diseases will be objectively presented; their results critically discussed and compared; and suggestions for future directions given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据