4.7 Article

Ages for Australia's oldest rock paintings

期刊

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 310-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-01041-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy
  2. AINSE Ltd
  3. Australian Research Council [LP130100501, LP170100155]
  4. Rock Art Australia
  5. Australian Postgraduate Award
  6. Kimberley Foundation Australia
  7. Australian Research Council [LP130100501, LP170100155] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiocarbon dating of mud wasp nests in the Kimberley region of Western Australia has established ages of up to 17,000 years for rock art from the earliest known, naturalistic, period of Australian Aboriginal figurative paintings. The results suggest that paintings in this style proliferated between 17,000 and 13,000 years ago, with one kangaroo painting securely dated to between 17,500 and 17,100 years.
Naturalistic depictions of animals are a common subject for the world's oldest dated rock art, including wild bovids in Indonesia and lions in France's Chauvet Cave. The oldest known Australian Aboriginal figurative rock paintings also commonly depict naturalistic animals but, until now, quantitative dating was lacking. Here, we present 27 radiocarbon dates on mud wasp nests that constrain the ages of 16 motifs from this earliest known phase of rock painting in the Australian Kimberley region. These initial results suggest that paintings in this style proliferated between 17,000 and 13,000 years ago. Notably, one painting of a kangaroo is securely dated to between 17,500 and 17,100 years on the basis of the ages of three overlying and three underlying wasp nests. This is the oldest radiometrically dated in situ rock painting so far reported in Australia. Radiocarbon dating of mud wasp nests in the Kimberley region of Western Australia has established ages of up to 17,000 years for rock art from the earliest known, naturalistic, period of Australian Aboriginal figurative paintings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据