4.8 Article

Development of Nano-Sulfide Sorbent for Efficient Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal Combustion Fuel Gas

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 17, 页码 9551-9557

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02115

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476189]
  2. Hong Kong Scholar Program [XJ2014033]
  3. General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [17206714, 17212015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface area of zinc sulfide (ZnS) was successfully enlarged using nanostructure particles synthesized by a liquid-phase precipitation method. The ZnS with the highest surface area (named Nano-ZnS) of 196.1 m(2).g(-1) was then used to remove gas-phase elemental mercury (Hg) from simulated coal combustion fuel gas at relatively high temperatures (140 to 260 degrees C). The Nano-ZnS exhibited far greater Hg adsorption capacity than the conventional bulk ZnS sorbent due to the abundance of surface sulfur sites, which have a high binding affinity for Hg-0.Hg-0 was first physically adsorbed on the sorbent surface and then reacted with the adjacent surface sulfur to form the most stable mercury compound, HgS, which was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis and a temperature-programmed desorption test. At the optimal temperature of 180 degrees C, the equilibrium Hg-0 adsorption capacity of the Nano-ZnS (inlet Hg concentration of 65.0 mu gm(-3)) was greater than 497.84 mu g.g(-1) Compared with several commercial activated carbons used exclusively for gas-phase mercury removal, the Nano-ZnS was superior in both Hg adsorption capacity and adsorption rate. With this excellent Hg-0 removal performance, noncarbon Nano-ZnS may prove to be an advantageous alternative to activated carbon for Hg-0 removal in power plants equipped with particulate matter control devices, while also offering a means of reusing fly ash as a valuable resource, for example as a concrete additive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据