4.6 Article

Thickness-Dependent Piezoelectric Property from Quasi-Two-Dimensional Zinc Oxide Nanosheets with Unit Cell Resolution

期刊

RESEARCH
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.34133/2021/1519340

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-1709025]
  2. Graduate Engineering Research Scholars (GERS) - Advanced Opportunity Fellowship (AOF) through State of Wisconsin
  3. University of Wisconsin Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative measurement of the nanoscale piezoelectric property of single-crystalline zinc oxide nanosheets revealed an intriguing tri-unit-cell relationship, with different thicknesses showing variations in the piezoelectric coefficient. The study offers a new experimental discovery towards nanoscale piezoelectricity from nonlayered materials that are piezoelectric in bulk.
A quantitative understanding of the nanoscale piezoelectric property will unlock many application potentials of the electromechanical coupling phenomenon under quantum confinement. In this work, we present an atomic force microscopy- (AFM-) based approach to the quantification of the nanometer-scale piezoelectric property from single-crystalline zinc oxide nanosheets (NSs) with thicknesses ranging from 1 to 4nm. By identifying the appropriate driving potential, we minimized the influences from electrostatic interactions and tip-sample coupling, and extrapolated the thickness-dependent piezoelectric coefficient (d(33)). By averaging the measured d(33) from NSs with the same number of unit cells in thickness, an intriguing tri-unit-cell relationship was observed. From NSs with 3n unit cell thickness (n = 1, 2, 3), a bulk-like d(33) at a value of similar to 9pm/V was obtained, whereas NSs with other thickness showed a similar to 30% higher d(33) of similar to 12pm/V. Quantification of d33 as a function of ZnO unit cell numbers offers a new experimental discovery toward nanoscale piezoelectricity from nonlayered materials that are piezoelectric in bulk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据