4.4 Review

Intermittent fasting: from calories to time restriction

期刊

GEROSCIENCE
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 1083-1092

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00335-z

关键词

Calorie restriction; Intermittent Fasting; Calories; Fasting; Time Restricted Feeding

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health
  2. NIH from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [Fi2GM123963]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calorie restriction (CR) is a dietary manipulation that can increase health and longevity, and recently, the length and periodicity of daily fasting have emerged as potential drivers behind beneficial health effects. Numerous strategies and eating patterns have been successfully developed to recapitulate the benefits of CR.
The global human population has recently experienced an increase in life expectancy with a mounting concern about the steady rise in the incidence of age-associated chronic diseases and socio-economic burden. Calorie restriction (CR), the reduction of energy intake without malnutrition, is a dietary manipulation that can increase health and longevity in most model organisms. However, the practice of CR in day-to-day life is a challenging long-term goal for human intervention. Recently, daily fasting length and periodicity have emerged as potential drivers behind CR's beneficial health effects. Numerous strategies and eating patterns have been successfully developed to recapitulate many of CR's benefits without its austerity. These novel feeding protocols range from shortened meal timing designed to interact with our circadian system (e.g., daily time-restricted feeding) to more extended fasting regimens known as intermittent fasting. Here, we provide a glimpse of the current status of knowledge on different strategies to reap the benefits of CR on metabolic health in murine models and in humans, without the rigor of continuous reduction in caloric intake as presented at the USU State of the Science Symposium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据