4.0 Article

Occupational Exposure during Asphalt Paving - Comparison of Hot and Warm Mix Asphalt in Field Experiments

期刊

ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 446-457

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa129

关键词

asphalt fumes; asphalt pavingorganic carbon; respirable dust

资金

  1. Confederation of Norwegian Enterprises

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the occupational exposure levels during road paving with hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalt (WMA), finding that paving with WMA significantly reduced the air concentration of asphalt vapor, organic carbon, and respirable particulate matter compared to paving with HMA. The results suggest that using WMA instead of HMA may have health benefits for asphalt pavers due to lower airborne contaminant levels.
Objectives: Several studies have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse health effects, including reduced lung function and lung cancer among asphalt pavers, which has been related to occupational exposure to contaminants during asphalt paving. Consequently, occupational exposure among asphalt pavers must be reduced.The aim of this study was to compare the impact of hot mix asphalt (HMA) and warm mix asphalt (WMA) paving on occupational exposure levels during road paving in field experiments. Asphalt temperatures when paving with WMA are usually lower than when paving with HMA due to differences in the asphalt's composition and method of application. Methods: On 11 different road sections, one lane was paved with WMA and one with HMA during the same work shift under approximately identical weather conditions. The weather conditions and asphalt surface temperature were monitored during paving. Fifty-seven samples of fumes and vapor, organic and elemental carbon, amines, and respirable, thoracic, and inhalable particulate matter (PM) fractions were collected by stationary sampling. In addition, 30 samples of fumes and vapor were collected by personal sampling Results: Compared to paving with HMA, paving with WMA significantly (P < 0.05; paired Student's t-test) reduced the geometric mean (GM) air concentration of asphalt vapor (0.04 versus 0.08 p.p.m.), organic carbon (OC; 0.09 versus 0.18 mg m(-3)), and respirable PM (0.12 versus 0.22 mg m(-3)). Additionally, the air concentration of OC correlated strongly with the respirable fraction of PM (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.83). Conclusions: Measured airborne concentrations of respirable PM, OC, and asphalt vapor were lower when paving with WMA than with HMA. Because exposure to airborne contaminants generated during asphalt paving is believed to be responsible for the adverse health effects observed among asphalt pavers, paving with WMA rather than HMA may have health benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据