4.0 Article

Quantitative Proteomics Using 18O Labeling on Target Peptides and Unlabeled Standards

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 633-640

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.12247

关键词

Mass spectrometry; Proteomics; Absolute quantification; O-18‐ water; Enzymatic labeling

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT: Ministry of Science and ICT) [2018R1A2B6008287]
  2. Changwon National University Research Fund in 2020
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B6008287] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of mass spectrometry and O-18-water labeling has led to the development of a new quantitative analysis method called QAUSIA. The experimental procedure demonstrated high accuracy and linearity, making it suitable for quantitative proteomics research.
A combination of mass spectrometry (MS) and O-18-water labeling has been applied to absolute quantitative proteomics. We introduce a new method called quantitative analysis using unlabeled standards and isotope-labeled analytes (QAUSIA). An experimental procedure with multiple-step O-18 labeling is proposed to produce such O-18-enriched peptides for investigation of labeling efficiency, response factor, and calibration curve. Furthermore, calibration curves employing unlabeled peptide as internal standard showed good linearity and similar slopes calculated from the mass spectra and the extracted ion chromatograms. Subsequently, the QAUSIA strategy was implemented on the targeted peptide of ovalbumin, and the calibration slope obtained from QAUSIA using the unlabeled synthetic peptide as a standard showed very similar results to the AQUA-based approach. In addition, the concentration of the QAUSIA strategy using the targeted peptide of ovalbumin was 5.07 +/- 0.14 nmol with respect to the theoretical expected value of 5.02 nmol, showing excellent accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据