4.5 Article

Effect of partial replacement of bentonite with biochar in liner soils

期刊

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 2079-2087

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-021-01319-x

关键词

Biochar; Hydraulic conductivity; Free swell; Unconfined compressive strength; Cracking potential

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the replacement of bentonite with biochar in compacted M sand bentonite mixtures. The results show that increasing biochar content decreases the maximum dry unit weight and increases the optimum moisture content. Samples with 10% biochar content have hydraulic conductivity lower than 1x10(-9) m/sec. Addition of wood and rice husk biochar decreases the free swell, strength, and cracking potential.
Biochar made from pyrolysis of biomass has wide applications as a soil amendment to reduce emission of greenhouse gases and improve the geotechnical properties of soil. Bentonite enhanced sand mixes are widely used as liner material in construction practice of landfills. Experimental investigation on partial replacement of bentonite with biochar was carried out in compacted M sand bentonite mix (80% M sand and 20% bentonite) which satisfied the requirements of liner soils. Biochar prepared from wood shavings using in-house developed pyrolysis kiln and rice husk biochar prepared using heap method were used in this study. The effect of partial replacement of 10% and 15% bentonite with both wood and rice husk biochar was studied. Examination of the results showed that in both wood and rice husk biochar samples, increase of biochar content decreased the maximum dry unit weight and increased the optimum moisture content. The samples with 10% biochar gave hydraulic conductivity less than 1x10(-9) m/sec. In both wood and rice husk biochar samples, free swell, strength, and cracking potential decreased with increase in biochar content. Results indicate that both wood and rice husk biochar up to 10% can effectively replace bentonite in compacted M sand bentonite mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据