4.7 Article

Exploring the Presence of Five Rare Earth Elements in Vineyard Soils on Different Lithologies: Campo de Calatrava, Spain

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11030458

关键词

viticulture; geostatistics; spatial distribution; Vitis vinifera L; REEs; La Mancha

资金

  1. Asociacion para la Promocion del Vino del Campo de Calatrava

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to understand the pedogeochemical signature of five rare earth elements in vineyard soils in Campo de Calatrava. Results showed that the distribution of REEs in soils is related to parent material and soil formation processes, with concentrations of Ce, Nd, Y, and Sc higher in volcanic soils. In some cases, the use of REE-based fertilizers may have a specific human impact on soil chemistry.
The aim of the work described here was to understand the pedogeochemical signature of five rare earth elements (REEs; Ce, Nd, La, Y, and Sc) in vineyard soils in Campo de Calatrava (a unique territory with calcareous, volcanic and metamorphic rocks). The mean contents in surface horizons of Ce, Nd, La, Y, and Sc were 65.7, 32.0, 35.5, 18.8, and 13.9 mg.kg(-1), respectively. In subsurface horizons the contents were Ce 62.8, Nd 31.1, La 35.7, Y 17.9, and Sc 14.4 mg.kg(-1). The results show that mean contents of REEs in the area under investigation are in the order Ce > Nd > La > Y > Sc. Ce has a very high range, with a value close to 150 mg.kg(-1). On the other hand, concentrations of Ce, Nd, Y, and Sc are higher in soils on volcanic material than in soils on nonvolcanic material, while only La values are lower in soils on volcanic rocks. The distributional maps of REEs in surface and subsurface horizons suggest that parent material and pedogenesis such as argillization and calcium carbonate accumulation are more important factors than the use of REE-based fertilizers, except in certain exceptional cases (consistent with a possible specific human impact after continuous fertilization).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据