4.8 Review

Organic Contaminants in Chinese Sewage Sludge: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature of the Past 30 Years

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 5454-5466

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05583

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21437004]
  2. Swedish Research Council [639-2013-6913]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07313001]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0417]
  5. China Scholarship Council
  6. Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality
  7. Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust [LTR 05/01/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of sewage sludge is increasing in China but with unsafe disposal practices, causing potential risk to human health and the environment. Using literature from the past 30 years (N = 159), we conducted a meta-analysis of organic contaminants (OCs) in Chinese sludge. Most data were available from developed and populated regions, and no data were found for Tibet. Since 1987, 35 classes of chemicals consisting of 749 individual compounds and 1 mixture have been analyzed, in which antibiotics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were the most targeted analytes. For 13 classes of principal OCs (defined as chemicals detected in over five studies) in sludge, the median (expressed in nanograms per gram dry weight) was the highest for phthalate esters (27 900), followed by alkylphenol polyethoxylates (12 000), synthetic musks (5800), antibiotics (4240), PAHs (3490), ultraviolet stabilizers (670), bisphenol analogs (160), organochlorine pesticides (110), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (100), pharmaceuticals (84), hormones (69), perfluorinated compounds (21), and polychlorinated biphenyls (15). Concentrations of PAHs in sludges collected between 1998 and 2012 showed a decreasing trend. Study findings suggest the need for a Chinese national sewage sludge survey to identify and regulate toxic OCs, ideally employing both targeted as well as nontargeted screening approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据