4.6 Article

A Novel Solution Methodology Based on a Modified Gradient-Based Optimizer for Parameter Estimation of Photovoltaic Models

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10040472

关键词

modified gradient-based optimizer; parameter estimation; photovoltaic; single-diode; double-diode; PV module

资金

  1. National Research and Development Agency of Chile [ANID/Fondap/15110019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modified gradient-based optimizer (MGBO) is proposed to improve performance in estimating the parameters of Photovoltaic models. MGBO accelerates convergence rate and avoids local optima, making it suitable for nonlinear optimization problems like Photovoltaic model parameters estimation. The results show that MGBO has fast conversion rate and precision compared to other algorithms in solving the optimization problem.
In this paper, a modified version of a recent optimization algorithm called gradient-based optimizer (GBO) is proposed with the aim of improving its performance. Both the original gradient-based optimizer and the modified version, MGBO, are utilized for estimating the parameters of Photovoltaic models. The MGBO has the advantages of accelerated convergence rate as well as avoiding the local optima. These features make it compatible for investigating its performance in one of the nonlinear optimization problems like Photovoltaic model parameters estimation. The MGBO is used for the identification of parameters of different Photovoltaic models; single-diode, double-diode, and PV module. To obtain a generic Photovoltaic model, it is required to fit the experimentally obtained data. During the optimization process, the unknown parameters of the PV model are used as a decision variable whereas the root means squared error between the measured and estimated data is used as a cost function. The results verified the fast conversion rate and precision of the MGBO over other recently reported algorithms in solving the studied optimization problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据