4.6 Review

Steroid Hormone Receptors: Links With Cell Cycle Machinery and Breast Cancer Progression

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620214

关键词

steroid hormone receptors (SHRs); cell cycle; breast cancer; estrogen receptor (ER); progesterone receptor (PR); androgen receptor (AR)

类别

资金

  1. Department of Science & TechnologyINSPIRE Senior Research Fellowship [IF170820]
  2. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB)-Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India [ECR/2015/000206]
  3. Department of Science & Technology and Biotechnology (DSTBT), Government of West Bengal [ST/P/ST/9G-21/2016]
  4. Extra Mural Grant, Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB) -Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India [EMR/2015/001835]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the role of steroid hormone receptors in cell cycle regulation, with a focus on their interaction with breast cancer.
Progression of cells through cell cycle consists of a series of events orchestrated in a regulated fashion. Such processes are influenced by cell cycle regulated expression of various proteins where multiple families of transcription factors take integral parts. Among these, the steroid hormone receptors (SHRs) represent a connection between the external hormone milieu and genes that control cellular proliferation. Therefore, understanding the molecular connection between the transcriptional role of steroid hormone receptors and cell cycle deserves importance in dissecting cellular proliferation in normal as well as malignant conditions. Deregulation of cell cycle promotes malignancies of various origins, including breast cancer. Indeed, SHR members play crucial role in breast cancer progression as well as management. This review focuses on SHR-driven cell cycle regulation and moving forward, attempts to discuss the role of SHR-driven crosstalk between cell cycle anomalies and breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据