4.6 Article

A Survival-Related Competitive Endogenous RNA Network of Prognostic lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in Wilms Tumor

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.608433

关键词

Wilms tumor; target; lncRNA; miRNA; mRNA; competing endogenous RNA; ceRNA

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871837, 81572117]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20132307110007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, multiple RNAs were evaluated in Wilms tumor samples to construct predictive survival models and a survival-related ceRNA network. The models showed good prognostic ability and were highly correlated with tumor stage and histological classification. These findings provide potential new biomarkers for improving the prognosis and treatment of Wilms tumor patients.
Wilms tumor (WT) commonly occurs in infants and children. We evaluated clinical factors and the expression of multiple RNAs in WT samples in the TARGET database. Eight long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs; AC079310.1, MYCNOS, LINC00271, AL445228.3, Z84485.1, AC091180.5, AP002518.2, and AC007879.3), two microRNAs (miRNAs; hsa-mir-152 andhsa-mir-181a), and nine messenger RNAs (mRNAs; TCTEX1D4, RNF133, VRK1, CCNE1, HEY1, C10orf71, SPRY1, SPAG11A, and MAGEB18) were screened from differentially expressed RNAs and used to construct predictive survival models. These models showed good prognostic ability and were highly correlated with tumor stage and histological classification. Additionally, survival-related ceRNA network was constructed using 35 RNAs (15 lncRNAs, eight miRNAs, and 12 mRNAs). KEGG pathway analysis suggested the Wnt signaling pathway and Cellular senescence as the main pathways. In conclusion, we established a multinomial predictive survival model and a survival-related ceRNA network, which provide new potential biomarkers that may improve the prognosis and treatment of WT patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据