4.6 Review

Neurodegeneration, Neuroprotection and Regeneration in the Zebrafish Retina

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10030633

关键词

light-induced retinal degeneration; chemical toxicity; mechanical damage; oxidative stress; diet; retinal stab; retinal damage; optic nerve; photoreceptors; retinal ganglion cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative retinal diseases lead to gradual loss of retinal neurons, requiring neuroprotective or regenerative strategies for treatment. Zebrafish, due to their similar eye structure and development to mammals, are commonly used as a model for studying these diseases.
Neurodegenerative retinal diseases, such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy, involve a gradual loss of neurons in the retina as the disease progresses. Central nervous system neurons are not able to regenerate in mammals, therefore, an often sought after course of treatment for neuronal loss follows a neuroprotective or regenerative strategy. Neuroprotection is the process of preserving the structure and function of the neurons that have survived a harmful insult; while regenerative approaches aim to replace or rewire the neurons and synaptic connections that were lost, or induce regrowth of damaged axons or dendrites. In order to test the neuroprotective effectiveness or the regenerative capacity of a particular agent, a robust experimental model of retinal neuronal damage is essential. Zebrafish are being used more often in this type of study because their eye structure and development is well-conserved between zebrafish and mammals. Zebrafish are robust genetic tools and are relatively inexpensive to maintain. The large array of functional and behavioral tests available in zebrafish makes them an attractive model for neuroprotection studies. Some common insults used to model retinal disease and study neuroprotection in zebrafish include intense light, chemical toxicity and mechanical damage. This review covers the existing retinal neuroprotection and regeneration literature in the zebrafish and highlights their potential for future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据