4.6 Review

The Role of Cytokines and Chemokines in Shaping the Immune Microenvironment of Glioblastoma: Implications for Immunotherapy

期刊

CELLS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells10030607

关键词

glioblastoma; cytokine; chemokine; immune suppression; microenvironment

资金

  1. Cancer Council SA Beat Cancer Project
  2. Cancer Australia [GNT 1186306]
  3. Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Fund
  4. Health Services Charitable Gifts Board (HSCGB)
  5. Neurosurgical Research Foundation
  6. Hospital Research Foundation
  7. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults, with conventional treatments showing limited improvement in patient survival over the past decade. The immunosuppressive mechanisms employed by tumor cells can hinder treatment efficacy, highlighting the importance of understanding intercellular interactions for potential immunotherapeutic targeting and better patient outcomes.
Glioblastoma is the most common form of primary brain tumour in adults. For more than a decade, conventional treatment has produced a relatively modest improvement in the overall survival of glioblastoma patients. The immunosuppressive mechanisms employed by neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells within the tumour can limit treatment efficacy, and this can include the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines and chemokines. These factors can play a significant role in immune modulation, thus disabling anti-tumour responses and contributing to tumour progression. Here, we review the complex interplay between populations of immune and tumour cells together with defined contributions by key cytokines and chemokines to these intercellular interactions. Understanding how these tumour-derived factors facilitate the crosstalk between cells may identify molecular candidates for potential immunotherapeutic targeting, which may enable better tumour control and improved patient survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据