4.8 Article

Molecular Characterization of Organosulfur Compounds in Biodiesel and Diesel Fuel Secondary Organic Aerosol

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 119-127

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03304

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [AGS-1227579, MRI-0923323]
  2. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration through Climate Program Office's AC4 program [NA13OAR4310066/NA13OAR4310062]
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. DOE
  5. US DOE [DEAC06-76RL0 1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary organic aerosol (SOA), formed in the photooxidation of diesel fuel, biodiesel fuel, and 20% biodiesel fuel/80% diesel fuel mixture, are prepared under high-NOx conditions in the presenth and absence of sulfur dioxide (SO2), ammonia (NH3), and relative humidity (RH). The composition of condensed-phase organic compounds in SOA- is measured using several complementary techniques including aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS), high-resolution nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (nano-DESI/HRMS), arid ultrahigh resolution and mass accuracy 21T Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (21T FT-ICR MS). Results demonstratethat sulfuric acid and condensed organosulfur species formed in photooxidation experiments with SO2 are present in the SOA particle. Fewer organosulfur species are formed in the high humidity experiMents, performed at RH 90%, in comparison with experiments done under dry conditions. There is a strong overlap of organosulfur species observed in this study with previous field and chamber studies of SOA. Many MS peaks of organosulfates (R-OS(O)(2)OH) previously designated as biogenic,or of unknown origin in field studies might have originated from anthropogenic sources, such as photooxidation of hydrocarbons present in diesel and biodiesel fuel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据