4.8 Article

Post Gold King Mine Spill Investigation of Metal Stability in Water and Sediments of the Animas River Watershed

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 21, 页码 11539-11548

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03092

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health Centers of Excellence on Environmental Health Disparities Research [1-P50-ES-026102-01]
  2. National Science Foundation under New Mexico EPSCoR [IIA-1301346]
  3. CREST [1345169]
  4. NIGMS ASERT IRACDA postdoctoral fellowship [K12 GM088021]
  5. Division Of Human Resource Development
  6. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1345169] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We applied spectroscopy, microscopy, diffraction, and aqueous chemistry methods to investigate the persistence of metals in water and sediments from the Animas River 13 days after the Gold King Mine spill (August 5, 2015). The Upper Animas River watershed, located in San Juan Colorado, is heavily mineralized and impacted by acid mine drainage, with low pH water and elevated metal concentrations in sediments (108.4 +/- 1.8 mg kg(1) Pb, 32.4 +/- 0.5 mg kg(1) Cu, 729.6 +/- 5.7 mg kg(1) Zn, and 51 314.6 +/- 295.4 mg kg(1) Fe). Phosphate and nitrogen species were detected in water and sediment samples from Farmington, New Mexico, an intensive agricultural area downstream from the Animas River, while metal concentrations were low compared to those observed upstream. Solid-phase analyses of sediments suggest that Pb, Cu, and Zn are associated with metal-bearing jarosite and other minerals (e.g., clays, Fe-(oxy)hydroxides). The solubility of jarosite at near-neutral pH and biogeochemical processes occurring downstream could affect the stability of metal-bearing minerals in river sediments. This study contributes relevant information about the association of metal mixtures in a heavy mineralized semiarid region, providing a foundation to better understand long-term metal release in a public and agricultural water supply.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据