4.6 Review

Radiogenomics in Colorectal Cancer

期刊

CANCERS
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13050973

关键词

radiogenomics; machine learning; deep learning; oncologic imaging; genomics

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal carcinoma is characterized by intratumoral heterogeneity that can be assessed by radiogenomics, which combines high-throughput quantitative data from medical imaging with molecular analysis. This approach is expected to advance personalized medicine but is still in its early stages with many challenges to overcome. The integration of image-derived features-radiomics and genomic profiles-genomics is a rapidly evolving field known as radiogenomics, with various studies dedicated to colorectal cancer showing potential for enhancing clinical decision-making.
Simple Summary: Colorectal carcinoma is characterized by intratumoral heterogeneity that can be assessed by radiogenomics. Radiomics, high-throughput quantitative data extracted from medical imaging, combined with molecular analysis, through genomic and transcriptomic data, is expected to lead to significant advances in personalized medicine. However, a radiogenomics approach in colorectal cancer is still in its early stages and many problems remain to be solved. Here we review the progress and challenges in this field at its current stage, as well as future developments. The steady improvement of high-throughput technologies greatly facilitates the implementation of personalized precision medicine. Characterization of tumor heterogeneity through image-derived features-radiomics and genetic profile modifications-genomics, is a rapidly evolving field known as radiogenomics. Various radiogenomics studies have been dedicated to colorectal cancer so far, highlighting the potential of these approaches to enhance clinical decision-making. In this review, a general outline of colorectal radiogenomics literature is provided, discussing the current limitations and suggested further developments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据