4.7 Review

Innovative Therapeutic Approaches for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040820

关键词

Duchenne muscular dystrophy; dystrophin restoration; antisense oligonucleotide chemistry; exon-skipping; stop codon reversion; gene therapy; innovative clinical trials

资金

  1. EU BIND grant [847826]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a common childhood muscle disease affecting males, with therapeutic advances targeting the dystrophin protein showing promise in treating the condition. Research into molecular pathways affected in DMD has resulted in the development of approved orphan drugs and promising gene therapy approaches.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common childhood muscular dystrophy affecting similar to 1:5000 live male births. Following the identification of pathogenic variations in the dystrophin gene in 1986, the underlining genotype/phenotype correlations emerged and the role of the dystrophin protein was elucidated in skeletal, smooth, and cardiac muscles, as well as in the brain. When the dystrophin protein is absent or quantitatively or qualitatively modified, the muscle cannot sustain the stress of repeated contractions. Dystrophin acts as a bridging and anchoring protein between the sarcomere and the sarcolemma, and its absence or reduction leads to severe muscle damage that eventually cannot be repaired, with its ultimate substitution by connective tissue and fat. The advances of an understanding of the molecular pathways affected in DMD have led to the development of many therapeutic strategies that tackle different aspects of disease etiopathogenesis, which have recently led to the first successful approved orphan drugs for this condition. The therapeutic advances in this field have progressed exponentially, with second-generation drugs now entering in clinical trials as gene therapy, potentially providing a further effective approach to the condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据