4.7 Review

The Management of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome: European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) Guideline

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030473

关键词

Peutz– Jeghers syndrome; STK11; guideline

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre [IS-BRC-1215-20007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientific data on the management of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is limited, necessitating more collaborative studies for better understanding of this rare condition. Current guidelines only cover gastrointestinal and pancreatic management, leaving other aspects in need of further research and discussion.
The scientific data to guide the management of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) are sparse. The available evidence has been reviewed and discussed by diverse medical specialists in the field of PJS to update the previous guideline from 2010 and formulate a revised practical guideline for colleagues managing PJS patients. Methods: Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Evidence levels and recommendation strengths were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A Delphi process was followed, with consensus being reached when >= 80% of the voting guideline committee members agreed. Recommendations and statements: The only recent guidelines available were for gastrointestinal and pancreatic management. These were reviewed and endorsed after confirming that no more recent relevant papers had been published. Literature searches were performed for additional questions and yielded a variable number of relevant papers depending on the subject addressed. Additional recommendations and statements were formulated. Conclusions: A decade on, the evidence base for recommendations remains poor, and collaborative studies are required to provide better data about this rare condition. Within these restrictions, multisystem, clinical management recommendations for PJS have been formulated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据