4.7 Article

The Outcome of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Extramammary Paget's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040739

关键词

extramammary Paget’ s disease; metastatic extramammary Paget’ s disease; chemotherapy; targeted therapy; survival analysis; docetaxel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with distant metastatic EMPD and found that while chemotherapy can prolong progression-free survival, it did not significantly improve overall survival. Considering the frequent adverse events of conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy may become a mainstay for the treatment of metastatic EMPD in the future.
The efficacy and survival impact of conventional chemotherapies for metastatic extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) have not been fully elucidated. This study examined the long-term outcome of chemotherapy for this indication. We conducted a retrospective review of 21 patients with distant metastatic EMPD (14 patients treated with chemotherapy and 7 patients treated without chemotherapy). The response rate of chemotherapy and patient survival were statistically analyzed. Among the 14 patients treated with chemotherapy, 12, 1, and 1 patient received docetaxel, paclitaxel, and low-dose 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, respectively, as the first-line treatment. The response rate was 50.0% (7/14), and the disease control rate was 64.3% (9/14). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.8 and 27.9 months, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that chemotherapy was a significant factor for prolonged PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.22, p = 0.038) but not for OS (HR = 1.71, p = 0.54). Ten patients (71.4%) had severe (grade 3 or 4) hematological adverse events. Although conventional chemotherapy improved PFS, we failed to show a significantly improved OS. Considering the frequent adverse events of conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy may become a mainstay for the treatment of metastatic EMPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据