4.7 Article

Prognostic Value of Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040634

关键词

melanoma; brain metastasis; inflammation; surgical resection; overall survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying preoperative laboratory inflammation markers in melanoma patients with brain metastasis undergoing surgery revealed that elevated CRP levels, higher NLR and PLR, and lower LMR were associated with reduced overall survival rates. These markers could potentially be integrated into preoperative treatment planning for affected patients.
Background: Metastatic melanoma disease is accompanied by highly systemic inflammatory responses. The prognostic value of preoperative laboratory inflammation markers in brain metastatic melanoma patients has not been adequately investigated so far. Methods: Preoperative inflammatory blood parameters were correlated to overall survival (OS) rates in melanoma patients that underwent surgery for brain metastasis (BM) between 2013 and 2019 at the authors' institution. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used for cutoff determination of routine laboratory parameters. Results: Median OS in the present cohort of 30 melanoma patients with surgically treated BM was 7 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-8.3). Initial elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (>10 mg/L), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >= 4, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) >= 145, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) < 2 were associated with significantly reduced OS rates. Conclusions: The present study identifies several preoperative peripheral inflammatory markers as indicators for poor prognosis in melanoma patients with BM undergoing neurosurgical treatment. Elevated initial CRP values, higher NLR and PLR, and lower LMR were associated with reduced OS and, thus, might be incorporated into preoperative interdisciplinary treatment planning and counseling for affected patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据