4.7 Article

Time series analysis and mechanistic modelling of heterogeneity and sero-reversion in antibody responses to mild SARS-CoV-2 infection

期刊

EBIOMEDICINE
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103259

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Mathematical modelling; Sero-reversion

资金

  1. Goldman Sachs
  2. Citadel Security
  3. Guy Foundation
  4. GW Pharmaceuticals
  5. Kusuma Trust
  6. Jagclif Charitable Trust
  7. UCLH Charity
  8. UKRI/MRC Covid rapid response [COV0331 (MR/V027883/1)]
  9. Public Health England
  10. British Heart Foundation (BHF) Accelerator Award [AA/18/6/34223]
  11. BHF Intermediate Research Fellowship [FS/19/35/34374]
  12. Wellcome Trust [207511/Z/17/Z]
  13. NIHR Biomedical Research Funding
  14. MRC Newton [MR/S019553/1, MR/R02622X/1]
  15. NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) :ITMAT
  16. Cystic Fibrosis Trust SRC
  17. Horizon 2020 Marie Curie Actions
  18. UKRI/NIHR UK-CIC grant
  19. Wellcome Trust Investigator Award [214191/Z/18/Z]
  20. CRUK Immunology grant [26603]
  21. Rosetrees Trust
  22. John Black Charitable Foundation
  23. Medical College of St Bartholomew's Hospital Trust
  24. National Institute for Health Research [DRF201811ST2004]
  25. University College London Hospitals (UCLH)
  26. Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  27. COVIDsortium website
  28. Wellcome Trust [207511/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. Wellcome Trust [214191/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, there are heterogeneous immune responses, with anti-S1 antibodies being cleared faster, transitioning more quickly to low levels of production, and experiencing greater reductions in production rate. In mild infections, relying solely on anti-S1 serology may underestimate the incidence of infections.
Background: SARS-CoV-2 serology is used to identify prior infection at individual and at population level. Extended longitudinal studies with multi-timepoint sampling to evaluate dynamic changes in antibody levels are required to identify the time horizon in which these applications of serology are valid, and to explore the longevity of protective humoral immunity. Methods: Healthcare workers were recruited to a prospective cohort study from the first SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak in London, undergoing weekly symptom screen, viral PCR and blood sampling over 16-21 weeks. Serological analysis (n=12,990) was performed using semi-quantitative Euroimmun IgG to viral spike S1 domain and Roche total antibody to viral nucleocapsid protein (NP) assays. Comparisons were made to pseudovirus neutralizing antibody measurements. Findings: A total of 157/729 (21.5%) participants developed positive SARS-CoV-2 serology by one or other assay, of whom 31.0% were asymptomatic and there were no deaths. Peak Euroimmun anti-S1 and Roche anti-NP measurements correlated (r = 0.57, p<0.0001) but only anti-S1 measurements correlated with near-contemporary pseudovirus neutralising antibody titres (measured at 16-18 weeks, r = 0.57, p<0.0001). By 21 weeks' follow-up, 31/143 (21.7%) anti-S1 and 6/150 (4.0%) anti-NP measurements reverted to negative. Mathematical modelling revealed faster clearance of anti-S1 compared to anti-NP (median half-life of 2.5 weeks versus 4.0 weeks), earlier transition to lower levels of antibody production (median of 8 versus 13 weeks), and greater reductions in relative antibody production rate after the transition (median of 35% versus 50%). Interpretation: Mild SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with heterogeneous serological responses in Euroimmun anti-S1 and Roche anti-NP assays. Anti-S1 responses showed faster rates of clearance, more rapid transition from high to low level production rate and greater reduction in production rate after this transition. Inmild infection, anti-S1 serology alone may underestimate incident infections. The mechanisms that underpin faster clearance and lower rates of sustained anti-S1 production may impact on the longevity of humoral immunity. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据